Blood Biochemistry Age Clock - An interpretable estimate of biological age and predictor of all-cause-mortality derived from routinely ordered blood biomarkers.

← Research Home← More in this subcategory
Europe PMCPublished 2026Nutrition, Aging & LongevityAging Biology & Longevity
Journal
Mechanisms of ageing and development
Record source
Europe PMC Research Library

Abstract / Description

"Omic" aging clocks(ACs) represent an established predictor of biological-age(BA)/all-cause mortality(ACM); however, they are expensive and lack interpretability/explainability. We developed a Blood-Biochemistry Age Clock (BBAC) composed of 11 routine blood biomarkers. The AC functions by transforming the individual's levels of blood biomarkers to years added/subtracted according to "biomarker-ACM risk-profile". The BBAC and PhenoAge were calculated for individuals of the UKB cohort and the results were associated with ACM and disease incidence (eight common chronic diseases) using univariant/multivariate Cox mortality analysis. The BBAC calculation procedure was further optimised. Mortality analysis was likewise performed on NHANES dataset with additional ACs (PCAge/LinAge) serving as predictors. Comparisons between ACs were done using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). In univariate ACM prediction on UKB cohort BBAC outperformed PhenoAge (AIC - 910749.6 vs. 912914.9). Similarly, BBAC was a better univariate disease incidence predictor(lower AIC). In multivariate ACM prediction PhenoAge exceeded BBAC (AIC - 890855.6 vs. 893294.4). Nevertheless, the optimised version of BBAC was better in predicting ACM in uni (BBAC/PhenoAge AIC - 154165.7/155217.6) as well as in multivariant setting (BBAC/PhenoAge AIC - 151006.9/151031.9). For multivariant disease incidence prediction the results were mixed. On the NHANES cohort BBAC and PhenoAge performed similarly, while PCAge and LinAge achieved the best mortality prediction power. BBAC is an explainable/interpretable AC with good ACM prediction ability.
Read original research ↗Open DOI ↗